Intrinsic properties and abortion debate essay
Overview[ edit ] The philosophical arguments in the abortion debate are deontological or rights-based.
Warren, however, thinks that "human being" is used in different senses in 1 and 2. Life is viewed as the highest intrinsic good, thus any act of deliberately taking it away becomes a serious moral issue.
In, women were raped.
The first sets of arguments I will discuss are biblical arguments. According to medical reports, the incidence of pregnancy for one-time unprotected sexual intercourse Dr.
Finally, there are some post-natal humans who are unable to feel pain due to genetic disorders and thus do not satisfy all of Warren's criteria.
This view is represented by some forms of Humanism and by moral philosopher Rosalind Hursthouse in her widely anthologized article "Virtue Theory and Abortion".
Argumentative abortion essay
The success of Marquis's argument thus depends on one's favored account of personal identity. The view that abortion should in most or all circumstances be legal generally rests on the claims: 1 that women have a right to control what happens in and to their own bodies; 2 that abortion is a just exercise of this right; and 3 that the law should not criminalize just exercises of the right to control one's own body and its life-support functions. Abortion is a procedure in which a pregnancy is terminated. Until when the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade made abortion legal in all 50 states, the act of getting an abortion was illegal in many states. Under this proposal, presence of brain waves would be enough to grant personhood, even with other features lacking. In 2 , "human being" means "biological human ". This argument has basically been answered. Warren agrees that infants are non-persons and so killing them is not strictly murder , but denies that infanticide is generally permissible. Marquis's argument has prompted several objections. So for example, if involuntary euthanasia of patients with a future filled with intense physical pain is morally acceptable, aborting embryos whose future is filled with intense physical pain will also be morally acceptable. I argue that it is ethically Marquis vs. Teenagers across America are getting abortions at a young age because they get pregnant and are not able to support their child.
Abortion has had a long and passionate history. The equality objection claims that Marquis's argument leads to unacceptable inequalities. In 2"human being" means "biological human ".
based on 49 review